HOME | CONTACT | WRITE TO THE EDITOR | WORK AT FREE-TIMES
www.snapclasses.com
 Quote

"[Michael] Wukela claimed he doesn’t look at his paychecks to see where the money’s coming from." -- Eva Moore, on conflicting answers to the question of who is paying the mayor's spokesman

The Side Line
www.freetimeshelpwanted.com
Take Better Pictures in a Snap!
Visit us on Facebook
Hablamos Espanol!
Side Line Blog
by Side Line
by Ron Aiken, November 2nd, 2009 01:03pm

The University of South Carolina is the best team in the nation — and has been for some time under Steve Spurrier — when it comes to giving the game away in the first quarter. Clemson, Florida, Iowa, Tennesee, Alabama .. the list goes on and on, year after year. Not only are Spurrier’s offenses mediocre at best, they define just how bad a team can be when it refuses to give itself a chance to win.

The Gamecocks are a joke on the offensive line. The running game, which was supposed to be a priority in 2009, is a non-factor in games. The passing game is inconsistent, can’t sustain drives and is susceptible to fatal turnovers, penalties and mistakes. And people, nine of 12 games have been played. There’s no more mystery involved: this offense stinks.

Mark my words: USC will not win another game in 2009. Not the way it has performed in the clutch. In fact, you’re better off wagering your money taking the under on how many quarters it will take before USC plays itself out of the game down the stretch.

Spurrier and his playcaller-in-chief son, Steve Spurrier Jr., are a horrible team together. I think the one wants to let the other develop and get experience so badly, the disaster we all see every week is the result. And guess what? Ain’t nothing going to change in that dynamic so long as Spurrier is the Head Ball Coach.

What will be Spurrier’s excuses should the Gamecocks lose out? How long should USC fans accept “We’re a struggling bunch of Gamecocks” from the man ordained by God himself to turn the program around. How long do national embarrassments on the field over and over merit progress of any kind?

If this is the best Spurrier can do by way of team preparation, conditioning, coaching and recruiting, then he should consider a voluntary salary reduction at the very least, as well as admit that the father-son coaching party is an absolute disaster. Until then, USC fans can expect a November that will only get worse — possibly much worse — before the time must come when Spurrier either comes to Jesus (he probably thinks Jesus has to come to him) or Eric Hyman does it for him.

Filed under: Spurrier, USC
Comments
If you think this is bad, where were you during the previous 100 years? Spurrier has the best record of any USC coach...ever (for equal tenure). While that may not be saying much with the history of our program, he has huge amounts of talent that are continuing to develop. An SEC championship will happen in 2010 or 2011. Mark those words.
2000 Gamecock November 2nd, 2009 01:52pm
What Gamecock fans learned was the Vols wanted the win more than Gamecock players and coaches. What we learned was Gamecock football players think Spurrier's practices are soft and weak. We learned Gamecock players want harder and more challenging practices while Spurrier thinks the practices are fine. What we learned is after 5 years of Coach Spurrier, the Gamecocks offensive and play calling still stinks. So much for Spurrier being the Evil Genius and Best Play caller in college football. Even Spurrier can not really believe all the hype piled on his past glories any more. At what point will Gamecock fans and Gamecock AD wake up. Lane Kiffin maybe the new Mouth of the South replacing Spurrier at that spot but he is also out coaching Spurrier. First year coach Kiffin and fill-in coach Swinney beat Spurrier. So much for Spurrier being the superior play caller. Hire a new offensive coach and let Spurrier suck up to the big weenies in the Gamecock Club. I want to win!!!
BlackMagic84 November 2nd, 2009 03:04pm
Ron, this is coming from the guy who said that "Gamecocks would win 3 games!" Give me a break! Talk about what we can do, and stop going down to negative town. The players believe in a "new carolina" why don't you? Debbie Downer!
Brian November 2nd, 2009 04:25pm
Ron complains when South Carolina wins, and wants everybody fired when the team loses. Last time I checked the Cocks won more than your bold "three win season" prediction. You are a genius. I've said before and will say again, 100+ years of mediocre (at best) football doesn't change in 4-5 years. Spurrier is the best South Carolina has had. Talent level is getting there, but yes more help is needed on the line (WHICH WON'T HAPPEN IN THE FIRST YEAR OF A NEW LINE COACH). Tennessee, Florida and those other schools actually have a tradition of success which makes it easier to recruit. We all want the program to be better, but it's not like there is a foundation of greatness to build on when we cling to the memory of one ACC championship and an '84 team that was good but still couldn't beat freakin' Navy! You are joke Ron. No wonder you were fired from The State.
Jason November 3rd, 2009 10:25am
Once again no facts to Rons articles.This offense ranks 52nd the nation with a ton of young players that have done a good job and are 6-3. A team you said would not win 3 games, wrong again Ron I know you right this trash column to stir up the masses looking to get on with a bigger paper but at least know what your talking about with some facts to back this garbage up.
Justthefacts November 3rd, 2009 03:41pm
I can't believe Ron Aiken get's paid to write this article. He is probably the most ignorant sports writer (if you want to call him that) in the nation. He is right that our o line is strugling and offense is still not reliable. However, what were you expecting? Considering our youth and lack of senior leadership I think we are doing well considering we are 6-3. I would like to see the team better prepared to play and they must for us to win another game this year. I was not expecting a 10 win season this year and I am excited about our youth and talent we have returning for the next 2 to 3 years for us to make run for the SEC.

Keep believing!

SIKSC
SIKSC November 4th, 2009 12:47pm
Have your say
*
*
*
Your comment will be displayed after it has been reviewed by the blog author. Please refer to our comments policy if you have any questions, or email editor@free-times.com.
www.mungo.com/
www.riverbanks.org/
www.cplite.com
www.nfcmoney.com
Wilson, Miller, Mulvaney and Spratt

It sounds like the name of a nefarious law firm in a gritty crime paperback, but these are actually the name of four candidates running for Congress. In both races -- incumbent Republican Joe Wilson against Democrat Rob Miller and incumbent Democrat John Spratt against Republican Mick Mulvaney -- the national health care reform debate has been a key theme setting the context. How do you think these races will play out?

 I'm a bot ... don't pay attention to my vote.
 Both the incumbents will win.
 Wilson will win, Spratt will lose.
 Wilson will lose, Spratt will win.
 Other (please specify)

Add a Comment?
First Name (optional)

Survey Comment (optional)
 /results/archive/
click on the day to see the events for that day
 Prev   Sep 2010  Next  
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30  
 
event: pick your type
 
music: pick your venue
 
dining: pick your cuisine
 
animatedcanvas.com/
www.free-times.com/index.php?cat=1991310090771539
Circulation VerifiedCopyright © 2010, Portico Publications
Copyright Info | Portico Corporate
Powered by PLANet w3 CMS Content Management System
PLANet Systems Group 2010